For the last six years the Minnesota House and Senate Judiciary Committees would not allow hundreds of Minnesota Citizens to present evidence and testimony of corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary. The Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances is guaranteed by the 1st Amendment of the Federal Constitution, but apparently not in Minnesota.
At the same time, any time the Judges wanted a hearing on their bill to take aware our Constitutional Rights to vote for Minnesota Judges in meaningful, contested elections, the Minnesota Legislature betrayed WE THE PEOPLE and invited the Judges in for a Mutual Admiration Society Session.
The Minnesota Judiciary has unlawfully retaliated against me by using a case that I am a Plaintiff in to exact their revenge. They fixed this case against me by using Simulated Litigation and Fact Shaping...
But enough background, I think the series of letters is more entertaining and insightful.....
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Via Fax 651-430-6272
7/5/2011
John C. Hoffman – 651-430-4420
Assistant Chief Judge
Minnesota 10th Judicial District
14949 62nd St N
Stillwater, MN 55082-3802
Don Mashak
Rt 1 Box 231
Albertville, MN USA 55301
RE: your letter of 6/30/2011
Hello:
Due to the 4th of July, 3 day weekend, I did not receive you letter until today. I called this morning only to find out the that Minnesota Judiciary is punishing Minnesota Citizens for not paying enough taxes by not answering phones on Tuesdays until the afternoon. And then in the afternoon the phone was busy.
I begin by asking 9 questions that I expect answered to so I can share them on the internet with my fellow citizens:
1) Is it a strategy of the Minnesota Judiciary to deliberately misstate facts in letters so they create a false record for future pleadings?;
2) Does the Minnesota Judiciary Subscribe to an absolute standard of morality or a relative moral standard of “Plausible Deniability”?;
3) Is it a standard ploy of the Judiciary to avoid phone calls from Pro Se litigants so they can lose by missing deadlines or not filing forms?
4) Are you going to tell me what alleged form I am missing regarding appeals or at least cite the Rule so I can find it.;
5) Is it true that you judges like to trip Pro Se Litigants up on the rules so they can’t win?
6) Is it true that once a year, usually at an expensive resort on Lake Mille Lacs, that the Minnesota Judiciary has a seminar essentially on “How to screw Pro Se litigants?”
7) After reading the undeniable true facts, please explain how you could get the facts in this matter so wrong;
8) Is the delay caused by the Court not returning my calls and in the Court Reporters not producing the transcripts, a strategy to allow the Appellate Court (or any other Court) to Rule against me for missing deadlines, overwhelming me so I make legal mistakes and/or to allow me to get tripped up on technicalities?
9) Is it your intention to aid and abet the criminal obstruction of justice (RICO) which is happening to me personally through unlawful, Simulated Litigation?
7)
YoYour bogus facts are far off base. For months now, I have asked for the transcripts in question. Judge Yunker’s recorder and her legal aid would not return my calls. I made a motion to the lower Court for an IFP of the expenses for the transcripts. When that remained unanswered, I made a motion to the Appellate Court to compel the lower Court to Rule on the IFP and to provide me with the transcripts.
Past transcripts that I had paid these same 2 Court Recorders to provide took 10-14 days. I see no reason, except graft, corruption and cover-up, why these transcripts should take twice as long or more.
Further, you misstate that I was not told when I could expect the transcripts. Both Court Reporters told me 10 -14 days. I have the voice mail recording of one of them saying just that. So which one of them lied to you? Isn’t that the basis for immediate termination? Or do you reward court personnel who know when its time to lie?
Further, on June 9th, 2011 the Court issued an order approving the IFP request for the transcripts. Are you still saying that despite said Court order I have to not complied with some Appellate Court Transcript Notice?
Are you telling me I cannot expect these transcripts anytime soon?
Are you telling, that despite the lower Court order, I will not be receiving these transcripts until I say the legal equivalent of “Simon Says” by submitting this Appellate Transcript Request form?
What punitive actions towards will you be taking against the Court and the Judicial Personnel who have obviously lied to you?
Please answer all the questions I have posed in writing, within 24 hours.
I want to be fair. I will post your response next to this letter on the letter on the internet, and let the rest of Minnesota Judge for them selves.
And I will treat your failure to answer any of my questions in this letter the way you Judges do. Your failure to respond will be interpreted to mean that your truthful answers to these questions would be detrimental to your position and reflect poorly the public’s perception of the Integrity of the Minnesota Judiciary. Is this clear to you?
Those were my thoughts.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
612-723-7780
Fax 612-605-1144
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak
TellMyPolitician 
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking the time to read and consider what I have posted and written.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak
Minnesota Injustice: True Court Horror Cases - With Names
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting. Your comment will display after it has been moderated for decorum, relevance and spam.